Sensory Processing Differences in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Does the Latest Research Say?

The scientific understanding of sensory processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) has shifted from viewing atypical reactivity as a secondary symptom to recognizing it as a foundational neurological characteristic that shapes the entire developmental trajectory of the individual. Current research, particularly studies published between 2020 and 2026, indicates that between 90% and 97% of autistic individuals experience significant sensory processing differences that impact their daily functioning, social communication, and quality of life.¹ These differences are characterized by a profound heterogeneity, manifesting as hyper-reactivity, hypo-reactivity, or sensory seeking across multiple modalities, including the five traditional senses and the internal systems of proprioception, vestibular function, and interoception.² The consensus emerging from neurobiological, computational, and clinical research suggests that these sensory features are not merely behavioral “quirks” but are the result of fundamental differences in neural circuitry, synaptic pruning, and the brain’s predictive mechanisms.¹

Diagnostic Frameworks and the Formalization of Sensory Features

The formal codification of sensory processing differences in diagnostic manuals represents a significant milestone in the scientific consensus. Prior to the publication of the DSM-5, sensory symptoms were often noted by clinicians but were not required for a diagnosis. The current standard, including the DSM-5-TR released in 2022, explicitly includes “Hyper- or hypo-reactivity to sensory input or unusual interests in sensory aspects of the environment” as one of the four possible manifestations under Criterion B: Restricted, repetitive patterns of behavior, interests, or activities.¹¹ This inclusion reflects the recognition that sensory differences are as central to the autistic experience as social-communication challenges.

Evolutionary Shifts in Clinical Classification

The transition from the DSM-IV to the DSM-5-TR and the concurrent development of the ICD-11 highlight an increasing international agreement on the necessity of identifying sensory phenotypes. While the DSM-IV focused on three domains (social, communication, and behavior), the DSM-5 merged these into two core domains: social communication and restricted/repetitive behaviors, with sensory features becoming an explicit part of the latter.¹³ Similarly, the ICD-11 mirrors this approach, emphasizing that sensory difficulties are a core diagnostic requirement and providing detailed guidelines for distinguishing autism with and without intellectual disability, a distinction that has significant implications for service eligibility and support planning.¹⁶

Diagnostic Standard	Category of Sensory Processing	Key Behavioral Indicators
DSM-5-TR (2022)	Criterion B4: Sensory Reactivity	Apparent indifference to pain/temperature; adverse response to specific sounds/textures; visual fascination with lights/movement.¹¹
ICD-11 (WHO)	Restricted/Repetitive Patterns	Atypical sensory responses considered core diagnostic features; distress in response to increased societal demands.¹⁶
DC:0-5 (2023)	Sensory Processing Disorder (SPD)	Recognized as a diagnostic entity in infancy and early childhood; may co-occur with or exist independently of ASD.¹⁹

The importance of these diagnostic revisions extends beyond clinical labeling; they provide a standardized language for researchers to investigate the underlying mechanisms. For instance, the DSM-5-TR’s emphasis on functional impairment ensures that sensory differences are evaluated in terms of their real-world impact, such as a child’s inability to attend a classroom due to auditory hypersensitivity or an adult’s difficulty maintaining employment in a highly stimulated environment.¹¹

Phenomenological Taxonomy of Sensory Reactivity

The scientific community generally categorizes sensory processing differences into four primary patterns: hyper-reactivity, hypo-reactivity, sensory seeking, and poor registration. These patterns are often determined by an individual’s sensory threshold—the amount of input required for the nervous system to respond—and their behavioral regulation strategy.²⁰

Hyper-reactivity and the Mechanism of Sensory Overload

Hyper-reactivity, or sensory over-responsivity (SOR), is characterized by a low sensory threshold and a passive or active behavioral response. In this state, even minor stimuli, such as the hum of a refrigerator or the texture of a clothing tag, can be perceived as intense, intrusive, or even painful.⁵ Approximately 70% to 90% of autistic individuals experience these heightened sensitivities, which often lead to sensory overload.²¹ During overload, the brain’s ability to process information breaks down, leading to “shutdowns” (where the person becomes unresponsive) or “meltdowns” (where the person exhibits intense emotional or physical distress).⁵

The impact of hyper-reactivity is particularly pronounced in auditory and visual domains. Autistic individuals frequently report being able to hear sounds that others do not notice, finding background noise exhausting and effortful to filter out.²⁰ This auditory hypersensitivity is linked to higher levels of baseline arousal and slower rates of neural habituation compared to typically developing peers.²³

Hypo-reactivity and the Challenge of Poor Registration

Conversely, hypo-reactivity, or under-responsivity, involves a high sensory threshold, where the individual requires much more input than usual to notice a stimulus. This can manifest as an apparent indifference to pain, a failure to respond to being touched, or a lack of reaction to loud noises.² Hypo-reactivity is often associated with “poor registration,” where the individual may appear withdrawn, difficult to engage, or disengaged from their surroundings because they are simply not receiving the necessary sensory information to interact.²⁰

Scientific evidence suggests that hypo-reactivity is just as prevalent and debilitating as hyper-reactivity, though it is often less disruptive to others and therefore less frequently identified in clinical settings.² In the context of self-care, hypo-reactivity to interoceptive cues can lead to significant health risks, such as not realizing one is hungry, thirsty, or in need of medical attention for an injury.⁶

Sensory Seeking as an Adaptive Regulatory Strategy

Sensory seeking involves the active pursuit of intense sensory experiences to stimulate a hypo-reactive system or to regulate an over-aroused one. Common behaviors include stimming (hand-flapping, rocking), an intense fascination with spinning objects or bright lights, and a craving for deep pressure.² While historically viewed as “pathological” behaviors to be extinguished, the current consensus, supported by first-person accounts and neurobiological data, views sensory seeking as a vital form of self-regulation.²

For many autistic adults, seeking out specific sensory inputs—such as listening to repetitive music, touching smooth textures, or engaging in intense physical activity—serves an adaptive function, helping to maintain their arousal within the “optimal attention and arousal window” (OAAW).¹ This window is the state in which a person is both alert and calm, and for autistic individuals, the boundaries of this window are often more extreme, requiring proactive sensory management to prevent slipping into states of under-arousal (boredom/depression) or over-arousal (anxiety/overload).¹

Comprehensive Modality Analysis

Autism research has expanded beyond the primary five senses to include vestibular, proprioceptive, and interoceptive systems, revealing that sensory processing differences are pervasive throughout the entire nervous system.¹

Auditory Processing and the Signal-to-Noise Problem

Auditory processing differences are among the most studied features of autism. The consensus highlights a critical “signal-to-noise” problem: autistic individuals often struggle to distinguish relevant auditory information (like a teacher’s voice) from irrelevant background noise (like a clock ticking).⁹ This difficulty is not due to a lack of hearing acuity but rather a difference in how the brain filters and prioritizes sounds.

Neurophysiological data indicates that autistic individuals exhibit significantly longer latencies in early event-related potentials (ERP), specifically the P/M50 and P/M100 components, which are associated with early sensory registration and filtering.³ These delays, often nearing a medium effect size, suggest that the “gatekeeping” mechanism of the auditory system is less efficient, allowing too much information to reach the higher processing centers of the brain simultaneously.³

Visual Processing and Detail-Oriented Perception

Visual differences in autism are often characterized by a detail-focused processing style, sometimes referred to as “weak central coherence.” Autistic individuals tend to excel at identifying local features—the specific patterns, colors, or textures of an object—but may struggle to integrate these features into a holistic “global” percept.³ This can lead to strengths in areas like pattern recognition and visual search tasks but creates challenges in social contexts, where reading a face requires the rapid integration of multiple moving parts (eyes, mouth, brow).¹

Sensory Modality	Typical Difference in ASD	Functional Impact
Auditory	Reduced habituation; delayed P50/M100 latency.³	Difficulty hearing speech in noise; sensory overload in loud spaces.⁹
Visual	Detail-focused; reduced global integration.²¹	Excellence in pattern recognition; difficulty interpreting facial expressions.¹
Tactile	Heightened sensitivity to light touch; seeking deep pressure.⁵	Aversion to certain clothing; use of weighted blankets for regulation.²⁴
Olfactory/Gustatory	Impaired odor identification; abnormal sniff response.²⁵	Severe food selectivity (picky eating); failure to detect dangerous smells.⁷
Vestibular/Proprioceptive	Clumsiness; atypical posturing.⁷	Challenges with balance and motor planning (praxis).³²
Interoceptive	Reduced awareness of internal states.⁶	Difficulty regulating hunger, thirst, or emotional arousal.²

The “Sniff Response” and Olfactory Identification

Recent studies (2020–2024) have identified a unique olfactory phenotype in autism. While odor detection (the ability to smell that something is there) is typically normal, odor identification (knowing what the smell is) is often impaired.²⁵ Furthermore, research has revealed a profound alteration in the “sniff response.” In neurotypical individuals, sniffs are automatically modulated: vigorous for pleasant smells and truncated for unpleasant ones. Autistic children, however, tend to sniff with the same intensity regardless of whether the odor is pleasant or noxious, such as rotten fish.³¹ This lack of automatic modulation suggests a fundamental disruption in the feedback loops between sensory perception and motor response.

Computational Mechanisms: The Predictive Coding Framework

One of the most powerful theoretical frameworks currently dominating the field is Predictive Coding, or the “Bayesian Brain” model. This framework suggests that the brain does not simply react to sensory input; it proactively predicts it.⁸ In this model, the brain maintains “priors” (expectations based on past experience) and compares them to incoming “sensory evidence.”

The Precision-Weighted Prediction Error

In the autistic brain, the consensus suggests there is a “precision-weighting” problem. Autistic individuals may attribute too much “precision” or importance to prediction errors—the differences between what was expected and what actually happened.²⁸ Because every minor deviation from expectation is treated as highly significant, the autistic brain cannot effectively filter out “noise.” This leads to a state where the world feels constantly unpredictable, loud, and overwhelming.⁸

Research into “Predictive Impairment in Autism” (PIA) indicates that while autistic individuals can learn predictive pairings, they struggle when the environment is “noisy” or the relationships between cues are inconsistent.³⁴ For example, a neurotypical brain might easily learn that a specific chime means “class is over,” even if there is background chatter. An autistic brain might struggle to form that association because it is giving equal weight to the chime and all the surrounding random noises.³⁴

Neural Habituation as a Predictive Failure

The common finding of reduced neural habituation in autism—where the brain continues to fire at high intensity in response to a repeated sound—is now viewed as a failure of predictive attenuation.²¹ In a neurotypical brain, once a sound is predicted as “safe and repetitive,” the brain stops wasting energy on it. In the autistic brain, the sound is treated as “new” or “surprising” every time it occurs. This constant state of “neural surprise” is believe to be a primary driver of the exhaustion and anxiety reported by many autistic people.²⁸

Neurobiological Foundations: Circuits and Synapses

At the cellular level, sensory processing differences are linked to specific alterations in the brain’s architecture and chemical signaling.¹

The Excitation-Inhibition (E-I) Imbalance Theory

A long-standing and currently supported theory is the E-I imbalance, which posits that autistic neural circuits have too much excitation or too little inhibition.⁹ This imbalance is often attributed to the hypofunction of Parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons, which are responsible for “gain control”—essentially the brain’s volume knob.⁹ When PV cells fail to provide adequate inhibition, sensory circuits become hyperexcitable, leading to the hypersensitivity seen in many individuals.

However, recent analysis (2023) suggests a more nuanced view: this imbalance does not always result in more “spiking” or brain activity. Instead, it often results in “degraded sensory coding”.⁹ The signals become “muddy,” making it harder for the individual to discriminate between different textures or sounds, even if they are hyper-reactive to them. This explains why an autistic person might be both extremely sensitive to touch and also “clumsy” or poor at identifying what they are touching (sensory discrimination disorder).⁹

Atypical Synaptic Pruning and Connectivity

During early development, the brain goes through a period of “pruning,” where unnecessary connections are removed to create efficient “highways” of information. In autism, atypical neuronal migration and pruning often result in a brain that is “hyperconnected locally but hypoconnected globally”.¹

The brain maintains an excess of short-range pathways between nearby cells, which may account for the “spiky” cognitive profiles seen in autism (e.g., exceptional memory for details). However, there is a deficit in the long-range white matter tracts that connect distant regions, such as the sensory cortex and the frontal lobes responsible for social regulation and attention.¹ This “functional disconnection” makes it difficult for the individual to integrate sensory information with social context, leading to challenges in multi-sensory integration.¹

Neurobiological Mechanism	Effect on Neural Information Flow	Clinical Correlate
PV Interneuron Hypofunction	Reduced gain control; noisy neural signaling.⁹	Difficulty focusing on a single voice in a room.⁹
Glutamate Over-activity	Excessive synaptic strengthening; hyperconnectivity.¹⁰	Intense sensory experiences; inability to suppress irrelevant stimuli.¹⁰
Atypical Synaptic Pruning	Failure to eliminate superfluous connections.¹	Detail-focused thinking; local over-processing.¹
Impaired Homeostatic Plasticity	Destabilization of network activity.⁹	Fluctuating sensory sensitivities from day to day.⁵

Functional Impact Across the Lifespan

Sensory processing differences are not static; they change and interact with the individual’s environment and developmental stage. While most research is centered on children, the 2020–2026 literature increasingly emphasizes the lifelong nature of these challenges.¹

The Classroom as a High-Stakes Sensory Environment

For autistic students, the classroom is often a site of significant sensory stress. The combination of intense lighting, the shuffling of peers, and suboptimal acoustics (low signal-to-noise ratio) creates a high “listening effort”.²⁰ Studies have shown that when background noise is present, autistic children must devote more cognitive resources to simply hearing the teacher, leaving fewer resources for understanding the material or engaging in social interaction.²⁰

Research from 2026 suggests that autistic children often prioritize “accuracy over speed” in sensory tasks, taking longer to process information but often achieving higher precision than neurotypical peers.²⁹ This suggests that “time pressure” in educational settings may be a significant barrier for autistic students, and structured, slower-paced environments can lead to improved outcomes.²⁹

Sensory Differences and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs)

Sensory integration difficulties have a profound impact on “functional autonomy.” Caregivers consistently report that sensory and “praxis” (motor planning) challenges interfere with basic routines such as dressing, bathing, personal hygiene, and toileting.³² For instance, a child with tactile hypersensitivity may find the feeling of water or soap unbearable, while a child with proprioceptive challenges may struggle with the motor sequences required to tie shoes or use utensils.²⁴

Domain of Daily Living	Impact of Sensory Processing Difference
Feeding	Extreme food selectivity based on texture/smell; GI symptoms.²⁵
Hygiene	Aversion to toothbrushing, hair washing, or nail cutting.²⁴
Dressing	Sensitivity to tags, seams, or specific fabrics (wool/synthetic).⁵
Toileting	Difficulty identifying internal cues (interoception); aversion to bathroom sounds/smells.⁶

Aging and the Intersection with Neurodegeneration

As the first large cohorts of individuals diagnosed with autism reach older age, researchers are identifying complex interactions between autism-related sensory traits and age-related cognitive decline.¹ The consensus from a 2022 Lancet Commission working group is that older autistic adults are frequently undiagnosed or misdiagnosed with other psychiatric conditions, and their sensory sensitivities may be misinterpreted as symptoms of dementia.³⁵ Furthermore, some studies suggest that the “detail-focused” processing style of autism might provide a level of protection against certain types of age-related decline, while others indicate an elevated risk of dementia in those with profound autism and intellectual disability.³⁵

Demographic and Subtype Heterogeneity

The “spectrum” nature of autism means that sensory processing profiles vary significantly by gender, cognitive ability, and co-occurring conditions.

The Female Phenotype and the Masking Phenomenon

Emerging research (2024–2025) suggests that autistic females may have a distinct sensory profile, often showing more severe symptoms in hearing and balance subscales compared to males.²⁶ However, females are also more likely to engage in “social masking”—the conscious or unconscious suppression of autistic traits to fit in.²¹ While masking may hide outward sensory distress, it leads to significant internalized stress and exhaustion, often resulting in “autistic burnout” later in life.²¹

Profound Autism and High Support Needs

The term “profound autism,” proposed in the 2022 Lancet Commission, describes individuals who require constant supervision and often have significant intellectual disability or minimal speech.³⁶ In this population, sensory processing differences are often extreme and are a primary driver of “challenging behaviors” (such as self-injury or aggression), which are frequently attempts to communicate sensory pain or to seek regulation in an overwhelming environment.²⁵

Therapeutic Interventions and Evidence-Based Support

Interventions for sensory differences are moving toward a “neurodiversity-affirming” model, which prioritizes the individual’s comfort and participation over “normalizing” their behavior.²³

Environmental Modification and Technology

The most effective “intervention” is often the modification of the environment. Strategies include using noise-canceling headphones, tinted glasses to reduce visual glare, and creating “quiet zones” in schools and workplaces.²² Modern technologies, such as immersive virtual environments, are also being used to help autistic individuals practice navigating sensory-rich spaces in a controlled, predictable way.¹⁰

Neuromodulation: rTMS and AIT

As of 2026, the combined use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) and Auditory Integration Training (AIT) is being studied for its synergistic potential.⁴¹ rTMS targeting the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) appears to reduce repetitive behaviors and improve emotional regulation by stabilizing abnormal neuroplasticity.⁴¹ When paired with AIT—which filters out frequencies the individual is hypersensitive to—these therapies may help “re-tune” the brain’s sensory systems, improving attention and social communication.⁴¹

Sensory Integration and Occupational Therapy

Sensory Integration Therapy (SIT) remains a cornerstone of support. Current practice guidelines (2025) show strong to moderate evidence for deep pressure tactile input (such as weighted vests or firm massage) and caregiver training on sensory strategies.³⁰ The consensus emphasizes that the goal of SIT is not to “fix” the sensory system but to help the individual develop an adaptive toolkit for regulation, improving their “joie de vivre” and ability to participate in meaningful activities.²³

Synthesis: The Scientific Consensus Summary

The scientific consensus regarding sensory differences in autism characterizes them as a pervasive, core diagnostic feature affecting approximately 90% to 97% of the autistic population, rooted in fundamental neurobiological variations such as excitation-inhibition imbalances, atypical synaptic pruning, and a “precision-weighted” predictive processing style.¹ These differences manifest across the lifespan as highly individualized patterns of hyper-reactivity (aversion to stimuli), hypo-reactivity (reduced response), and sensory seeking (active pursuit of input), which significantly influence social communication, attentional focus, and the performance of daily living activities.⁵ Current evidence supports a “sensory-first” developmental model, where early-stage alterations in basic sensory registration and neural habituation cascade into the complex social and behavioral phenotypes of the disorder, necessitating personalized, multidisciplinary support strategies that prioritize environmental accommodation and autonomic regulation over behavioral suppression.⁹

Conclusion: Future Directions in Research and Policy

The monumentally challenging landscape of autism research in 2025 and 2026—marked by both significant funding cuts and breakthroughs in data science—highlights the urgent need for continued investigation into the biological subtyping of sensory phenotypes.⁴⁴ The integration of mathematical modeling, international consortia like AIMS-2-TRIALS, and first-person advocacy is driving a move toward “personalized health models”.³⁷

For professionals in the field, the evidence is clear: sensory processing is not a peripheral issue but the lens through which the autistic individual perceives their entire world. Success in education, employment, and social life for the autistic population depends on a collective shift toward sensory-informed environments that respect the unique neurological configuration of the autistic brain. Addressing these needs requires a coordinated approach across primary care, specialized clinics, schools, and community services to ensure that the 78 million autistic people worldwide can lead fulfilling, self-determined lives.²²

Works cited

Part 1: Brain & Sensory Processing Differences Across the Lifespan, accessed April 3, 2026, https://autism.org/brain-sensory-processing-differences/
Sensory Phenotypes in Autism Spectrum Disorder Associated with Distinct Patterns of Social Communication, Repetitive and Restrictive Behaviors or Interests, and Comorbidities: A State-of-the-Art Review – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12839194/
Neurophysiological Alterations during Sensory Processing in Autism – A Meta-Analysis, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.15.25327383v1.full-text
A Systematic Review of Treatment for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: The Sensory Processing and Sensory Integration Approach – MDPI, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/11/10/1222
Autism and sensory processing – National Autistic Society, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.autism.org.uk/advice-and-guidance/about-autism/sensory-processing
Sensory processing disorder (SPD) – Autism Speaks, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.autismspeaks.org/sensory-processing-disorder
Sensory Processing Disorder vs. Autism: What’s the Difference?, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.autismparentingmagazine.com/autism-sensory-processing-disorder/
Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1713833/full
Circuit-level theories for sensory dysfunction in autism … – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neurology/articles/10.3389/fneur.2023.1254297/full
Neuroplasticity-Based Approaches to Sensory Processing … – MDPI, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/26/15/7102
Autism diagnostic criteria: DSM-5, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.autismspeaks.org/autism-diagnostic-criteria-dsm-5
Clarifying Autism in the DSM-5: A Guide for Adults, accessed April 3, 2026, https://embrace-autism.com/decoding-autism-in-the-dsm-5/
Autism Diagnosis in DSM-5: What Changed & Why It Matters – Majestic Care ABA, accessed April 3, 2026, https://majesticcareaba.com/blog/autism-diagnosis-dsm-5-criteria/
Banking and Insurance (Pre-Meeting) 3/7/2025 – BILL ANALYSIS AND FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2025/756/Analyses/2025s00756.pre.bi.PDF
Diagnostic Criteria for Autism Spectrum Disorder in the DSM-5 | CHOP Research Institute, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.research.chop.edu/car-autism-roadmap/diagnostic-criteria-for-autism-spectrum-disorder-in-the-dsm-5
2.2 DSM-5, ICD-10 and ICD-11 – The Open University, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/mod/oucontent/view.php?id=66953§ion=2.2
Innovations of the ICD-11 in the Field of Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Psychological Approach – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9881114/
About Autism – Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.nlmfoundation.org/about-autism/
Course Content – #96673: Sensory Integration and Processing Problems: Impact on Care, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.netce.com/course/content/sensory-integration-and-processing-problems-impact-on-care/96673/2594
Implications of Sensory Processing and Attentional Differences Associated With Autism in Academic Settings: An Integrative Review – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.695825/full
Light and sound hypersensitivity in autism spectrum … – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1771956/full
Sensory processing in autism: a call for research and action – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1584893/full
Latest Research Findings | STAR Institute, accessed April 3, 2026, https://sensoryhealth.org/basic/latest-research-findings
Sensory Integration in Autism Spectrum Disorders, accessed April 3, 2026, https://autism.org/sensory-integration/
Sensory Processing Disorder in Autism Spectrum Disorder: What Speech Therapist Should Know – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377358812_Sensory_Processing_Disorder_in_Autism_Spectrum_Disorder_What_Speech_Therapist_Should_Know
Sensory Processing Differences in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Narrative Review of Underlying Mechanisms and Sensory-Based Interventions – Semantic Scholar, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Sensory-Processing-Differences-in-Individuals-With-Patil-Kaple/5e1a4e3638ae831f37ec18b62e2890dc5a57f47e
Neurophysiological Alterations during Sensory Processing in Autism – A Meta-Analysis, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391778896_Neurophysiological_alterations_during_sensory_processing_in_autism_-_A_Meta-Analysis
Predictive Coding Theory and Autism: Understanding the Brain’s Processing Style, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.myndset-therapeutics.com/post/predictive-coding-theory-and-autism-understanding-the-brain-s-processing-style
Sensory Processing of Time and Space in Autistic Children – MDPI, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9067/12/10/1366
Systematic review of sensory-based interventions for children and youth (2015–2024), accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/pediatrics/articles/10.3389/fped.2025.1720179/full
Sensory Abnormalities in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Focus on the Tactile Domain, From Genetic Mouse Models to the Clinic – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6997554/
Performance of Daily Living Activities of Autistic Children With Sensory Processing Difficulties: Caregivers′ Perceptions – ResearchGate, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/403169635_Performance_of_Daily_Living_Activities_of_Autistic_Children_With_Sensory_Processing_Difficulties_Caregivers’_Perceptions
Predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder | Journal of Neurophysiology | American Physiological Society, accessed April 3, 2026, https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/jn.00543.2015?doi=10.1152/jn.00543.2015
Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review of …, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8043993/
Autism, Diagnostics, and Dementia: A Consensus Report From the 2nd International Summit on Intellectual Disabilities and Dementia – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12144002/
Understanding profound autism: implications for stigma and supports – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1287096/full
The Lancet Commission on the future of care and … – Nicola Schaan, accessed April 3, 2026, https://nicolaschaan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/The-Lancet-Commission-on-the-future-of-care-and-clinical-research-in-autism-Lord-et-al.-2021-.pdf
Sex/gender differences in autistic traits, intelligence and executive functions of school-aged autistic children without intellectual disability – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12779687/
Profound Concerns about “Profound Autism”: Dangers of Severity Scales and Functioning Labels for Support Needs – MDPI, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/13/2/106
Autistic Perspectives on the Future of Clinical Autism Research – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9242721/
Clinical efficacy observation of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with auditory integration training in children with ASD – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1704732/full
Evaluating the Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Auditory Integration Training for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for a Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.researchprotocols.org/2026/1/e80243
Sensory Processing Challenges in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Genetic Conditions: An Observational Study – PMC, accessed April 3, 2026, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11467969/
2025 Autism Research Year in Review, accessed April 3, 2026, https://autismsciencefoundation.org/2025-year-in-review/
The Rise of Autism, accessed April 3, 2026, https://autism.fratnow.com/blog/the-rise-of-autism/
A Multi-Scale Mathematical Framework for Modelling the Dynamic Nature of Autism Spectrum Disorder Symptoms: Integrating Predictive Coding, Information Theory, and Network Principles – Frontiers, accessed April 3, 2026, https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1787120/full